The Department of Energy
(DOE) is seeking advanced biofuels that can serve as “drop-in” replacements
for petroleum products and use the same refining and distribution network,
Under Secretary of Energy Kristina Johnson on Nov. 17 told delegates
at the fourth annual Cellulosic Biofuels Summit. These "drop-in"
replacements could have less drawbacks to corn-based ethanol. “One
thing is, [corn-based ethanol] is not a very energy-dense fuel,” Johnson
said. Ethanol has fewer British thermal units of energy per gallon than
gasoline. In addition, ethanol readily attracts water and is corrosive,
Johnson said. “So it’s not compatible with the…$9 trillion energy
refinery and gas-station infrastructure that we currently have…The
future is probably not corn-based ethanol,” Johnson said.
Johnson said much of
the US infrastructure is decades old. This includes energy infrastructure,
as well as physical infrastructure. Emerging countries without established
infrastructure “are able to leapfrog us,” Johnson said. China, for
example, is skipping the installation of telephone land lines and going
straight to cell phones, she said. “That’s what we have to do in
this country, in every single sector of our manufacturing process,”
Johnson said. “And we’re doing that in the biofuels area.”
Ethanol production is
using 30 percent of the nation’s corn crop, Johnson said. To meet
legislated requirements for increased use of biofuels, she said the
US needs to adopt policies to develop cellulosic ethanol. “This is
probably the most important thing we can do for energy in this country,”
she added.
The DOE is sponsoring
research that uses thermochemical processes to produce petroleum-like
fuels from biomass, known as bio-oil. A process known as pyrolysis,
for instance, can convert solid biomass into “bio-oil,” which can
be further refined for uses that include electricity generation or fuel
for diesel, gasoline, or jet engines. However, while pyrolysis demonstration
facilities are being built or operated in the US, Canada, Europe, and
Asia, at present there are not integrated fully commercial facilities
where the bio-oil is converted to either electricity or transportation
fuels.
The comments from Johnson
reinforce the Evolution Fuels perspective that the production of cellulosic
ethanol, as opposed to corn-based ethanol, is a viable alternative over
the long term, with the US ultimately needing to find a way to produce
ethanol from non-food based sources.